02332 2200361 4500001002100000005001500021035002000036007000300056008003900059084001500098100002500113245008800138250002600226260000900252300001700261650002200278650001900300650003100319650001200350700003200362700002200394700001900416700002100435700002400456700002300480700002100503700001800524700002500542520132600567651001401893856004701907990001601954INLIS00000000001807520220422075336 a0010-0222000049ta220422 | | |  aARTVET23721 aWardhana, April Hari1 aOccurrence and genetic identifications of porcine Entamoeba /cWardhana, April Hari aParasitology Research c2020 a1-16 halaman 4aEntamoeba polecki 4aEntamoeba suis 4aGastrointestinal parasites 4aSubtype1 aSawitri, Dyah Haryuningtyas1 aEkawasti, Fitrine1 aMartindah, Eny1 aApritadewi, Dias1 aShibahara, Tomoyuki1 aKusumoto, Masahiro1 aTokoro, Masaharu1 aSasai, Kazumi1 aMatsubayashi, Makoto aEntamoeba suis and E. polecki subtype (ST) 1 and ST3 recently have been inferred to be virulent in pigs. However, because relevant molecular epidemiological surveys have been limited, the prevalences of these species remain unknown and their pathogenicities are still controversial. We surveyed 196 fecal samples of pigs (118 of adults, 78 of piglets) at Tangerang in West Java, Indonesia, in 2017, employing PCR using porcine Entamoeba-specific primers. E. suis was the more frequently detected species, observed in 81.1% of samples, while E. polecki ST1 and ST3 were detected in 18.4% and 17.3% of samples, respectively; mixed infections (harboring 2–3 species or subtypes of Entamoeba) were confirmed in 29.3% of positive samples. Statistically significant differences in the positive rates were not seen between adult pigs and piglets, except for those of E. polecki ST3. The prevalences of Eimeria spp. and/or Cystoisospora suis (79.1%), strongyles (55.6%), and Strongyloides spp. (6.1%) were also observed morphologically in the samples. Further chronological or seasonal investigations of pigs and humans in these high-prevalence areas are needed to assess the virulence of the Entamoeba parasites, including the effects on pig productivity, and to evaluate the zoonotic impacts of these organisms 4aIndonesia ahttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-020-06806-0 a00000020612